The OSI does not endorse FSF license analysis (interpretation) as per their disclaimer. the case of the NASA Open Source Agreement, which requires the code to be "original" work. The open source definition allows for further restrictions like price, type of contribution and origin of the contribution, e.g. There are licenses accepted by the OSI which are not free as per the free software definition. FSF's free software and OSI's open-source licenses together are called FOSS licenses. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it considers free. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses. There is no one universally agreed-upon definition of FOSS software and various groups maintain approved lists of licenses. Jevgeni's personal blog can be found at .FOSS stands for "Free and Open Source Software". Squill ( ) is a typesafe internal DSL for constructing and executing SQL queries. Aranea ( is a web development and integration platform based on strong object-oriented principles. Besides the commercial products made for ZeroTurnaround, Jevgeni is the co-founder of two open-source projects - Aranea and Squill. He has an active research interest, publishing several papers on topics ranging from category theoretical notions to typesafe Java DSLs. He has spoken at international conferences for several years, including JavaPolis/Devoxx, JavaZone, and JAOO on topics ranging from: "Do you really get Classloaders" to "Zero Turnaround in Java Development". As part of the effort to reduce development time he wrote the JavaRebel prototype and has led development since ZeroTurnaround's inception in 2007. Previously, Jevgeni worked as the R&D director of Webmedia, Ltd, the largest custom software development company in the Baltics. Any thoughts to share with the french speaking Java community ? Can we expect in the near future to see in ZeroTurnaround portfolio some JRebel-like products targeting other platforms, like DotNET for example ? Is LiveRebel, currently in private beta, the logical continuation of JRebel ? Can you share some information about this new product ? Could it be something interesting for you to have a JRebel plugin focused community growing and where everyone would provide plugins to the community, maybe hosted by ZeroTurnaround ? What do you think about current hype around OSGi ? Would ZeroTurnaround be interested in the opportunity to participate in enhancement of OpenJDK's ClassLoader and Hotswap components ? Which technical limitation on the JVM would you wish to disappear in order to enhance JRebel? In other words, are there capabilities you would expect in JRebel but can't implement because of JVM limitations ? If not confidential, how many 2.2.1 licenses did you sell ? Any change in licensing model with 3.0 release ? Any idea of plugins for third party framework to add in JRebel codebase? For example, JSF for which configuration is not reloaded by JRebel and requires a restart when a managed bean is added, or commons-chain which loads only one time its catalogs at startup. Which are the next challenges for JRebel after version 3.0 release ? Which IDE has currently the best JRebel support through plugin ? Does ZeroTurnaround lead these integration work on the most popular IDEs or prefer to let each community do the work ? Do you think that you have competitors on JRebel's business segment ? How and when has JRebel (formerly JavaRebel) started? Do you plan to allow other ways to order a license than using a credit card ? Some companies only acquire licenses based on an order and a bill, with payment relying on banking operations. Which IDE is mostly used by ZeroTurnaround's team ? Why ? How many people are employed by ZeroTurnaround ? Interview en version originale anglaise de David Booth et Jevgeni Kabanov Table des matières
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |